Fraud accusations move fast, leading to frozen accounts, sudden administrative leave, or immediate licensing board inquiries long before formal charges are filed. Facing these high-stakes situations requires acting quickly to protect your rights, career, and reputation.
An experienced Charlotte criminal defense lawyer can intervene early to analyze the state’s allegations, examine how intent is defined, and build a strategic defense tailored to your situation. Whether you are dealing with corporate billing allegations, identity theft claims, or financial record investigations, consulting a dedicated Charlotte fraud lawyer as early as possible helps protect your rights.
The Law Office of Kevin L. Barnett has practiced criminal defense in Charlotte since attorney Kevin L. Barnett was admitted to the North Carolina State Bar in 1984. Attorney Barnett holds an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell, representing the highest tier of peer-reviewed professional excellence.
That combination of over four decades in Mecklenburg County courtrooms and a stellar peer-reviewed reputation is what transforms a fraud accusation into a strategic defense with a clear plan forward. Reach out today to discuss what the state must prove in your case.

To secure a fraud conviction under North Carolina law, prosecutors must establish specific elements beyond a reasonable doubt. Central to any fraud case is proving both a material misrepresentation and a distinct criminal intent to deceive.
Under North Carolina’s primary fraud statute, obtaining property by false pretenses is a felony. The law covers anyone who knowingly and designedly obtains, or tries to obtain, money, goods, services, or property through false pretenses with the intent to cheat or defraud. The statutory term “knowingly” places a significant burden on the state to demonstrate clear awareness and deliberate action.
Because intent is an essential element, an honest billing mistake, a misunderstanding on paperwork, or reliance on incorrect information from third parties does not meet the legal threshold for criminal fraud, even if financial discrepancies exist.
Challenging the prosecution’s evidence of intent often requires examining the integrity of collected records, such as computer activity, financial documents, handwriting samples, or video surveillance footage.
Defense strategies often center on testing whether the state can prove deliberate deception rather than ordinary negligence or a genuine commercial dispute.
Working alongside financial experts, forensic analysts, and investigators helps us thoroughly scrutinize the state’s evidence at every stage of the legal process.
The criminal defense fraud lawyers at The Law Office of Kevin L. Barnett defend clients facing the following kinds of fraud charges:
Each of these charges carries its own paperwork trail, and each one requires the state to connect that paperwork to a specific intent to deceive, not just a disputed transaction or a disagreement over money owed. Working through that evidence early, before a case is set for trial, is usually where a defense gets built or falls apart.
Several factors can contribute to the need for pursuing a plea bargain in fraud cases. If we decide not to take the case to court, we have extensive experience in negotiating plea bargains with prosecutors that reduce the charges or sentence against our client.
While we can’t guarantee a specific kind of outcome, prosecutors are often willing to consider a reduction in jail time, fines, and charges in exchange for community service or a willingness to help authorities.
Restitution, the money a court orders paid back to whoever was allegedly defrauded, is frequently part of those negotiations and can factor into whether jail time is served or suspended (not served if the court’s conditions are met). Understanding how the local prosecutor’s office typically approaches a given type of fraud charge is part of what shapes a realistic negotiating strategy from the start.
Obtaining property by false pretenses under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-100 is the statute prosecutors reach for most often in general fraud cases, including check fraud and many billing schemes. The dollar amount involved decides how serious the felony is.
If the value of the property obtained is $100,000 or more, a violation is a Class C felony, and if it is less than $100,000, it is a Class H felony. A Class C felony carries a far longer potential prison term than a Class H felony, which is why the state’s valuation of the alleged loss often becomes a contested issue in its own right.
Fraud carried out through a computer, such as using someone else’s login credentials to submit a false claim or move funds, falls under a separate set of laws.
It is unlawful to willfully access or cause to be accessed any computer, computer program, computer system, or computer network for the purpose of devising or executing a scheme to defraud, or obtaining property or services through false pretenses, under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-454.
A violation is a Class G felony if the scheme causes more than $1,000 in damage or the property obtained is worth more than $1,000, and any other violation is a Class 1 misdemeanor.
Insurance fraud is charged under a different chapter of state law entirely and carries its own felony penalties. That is one more reason the specific statute behind a fraud charge, not just the word “fraud” on the paperwork, determines what a conviction could actually mean for sentencing.
Kevin Barnett has handled criminal cases in North Carolina’s state and federal courts since 1984. He was admitted to the North Carolina State Bar and the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina that year, and to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in 1991.
That range of admissions shapes how a fraud case gets approached from the first phone call:
That combination of long-standing courtroom relationships and a willingness to prepare for trial is often what gives a fraud defense its leverage at the negotiating table.
The Law Office of Kevin L. Barnett has represented clients in federal and state cases involving fraud, deception, and financial allegations, including the following results.
| Case | Charges | Result |
|---|---|---|
| United States v. Liu | Immigration fraud and bribery of a federal officer | Acquitted on all charges |
| United States v. Kothari | Interstate extortion and blackmail | Not guilty verdict after under 3 hours of jury deliberation |
| Andrews v. Crump | Civil suit against two North Carolina Department of Revenue officers over a $6 million tax lien | $6.4 million jury verdict for the firm’s clients after 8 years of litigation and an appeal |
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Felony fraud charges filed in Charlotte are heard at the Mecklenburg County Courthouse at 832 East Fourth Street in Charlotte, which houses the Superior Court.
Superior Court handles civil cases involving more than $25,000 and all felony criminal cases, which means most felony fraud charges are heard in that building rather than in District Court.
The Mecklenburg County District Attorney’s Office, led by District Attorney Spencer B. Merriweather III in 2017, prosecutes state-level felony fraud cases filed in the county, and understanding how that office tends to value and charge a given set of facts is part of building a defense that fits the actual courtroom you will appear in, not a generic description of how fraud cases work elsewhere.
A: Yes. Anything said to an investigator before charges are filed can become evidence later, and fraud cases often turn on statements made early in an investigation. Talking with a lawyer before answering further questions protects you whether charges follow or not.
A: The state has to prove you knew a representation was false and intended to deceive someone with it. A genuine mistake, a misunderstanding, or a contract dispute does not meet that standard on its own, even when money changed hands.
A: Licensing boards in fields such as insurance, real estate, banking, and health care often treat a fraud conviction as grounds for suspension or revocation, separate from whatever sentence a court imposes. That collateral risk is one reason fighting the charge itself matters as much as the criminal penalty.
A: Most felony fraud charges in Mecklenburg County are heard at the Mecklenburg County Courthouse on East Fourth Street in Charlotte, where Superior Court handles felony matters. Misdemeanor-level charges may instead proceed through District Court at the same location.
A: Often, yes. Prosecutors may agree to reduce a charge, agree to a lesser offense, or accept restitution and community service as part of a negotiated plea, particularly in cases where the evidence of intent is weaker than the dollar amount alone suggests.
A: North Carolina treats taking or possessing someone else’s card as a separate offense from actually using it to obtain money or goods. A person can face one charge, the other, or both, depending on what the evidence shows about possession versus use.
A: Not always. Some fraud-related offenses, including certain financial transaction card violations, are charged as misdemeanors when the amount involved falls below a statutory dollar threshold. Whether a charge is filed as a felony or misdemeanor can turn entirely on how prosecutors value the alleged loss.
A: Any paperwork connected to the allegation, including correspondence, account statements, contracts, or notices from a licensing board or employer, helps an attorney evaluate the specific intent evidence the state is likely to rely on.
A fraud allegation does not have to define the outcome of your case before a prosecutor has proven intent. The sooner a Charlotte fraud defense attorney at The Law Office of Kevin L. Barnett can review the evidence against you, the more options tend to remain open for resolving the case on favorable terms.
To learn more about how we can help you, contact us today to talk through your situation and your next steps.



© Copyright 2026 The Law Office of Kevin L. Barnett • All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy
*Images are obtained under license from Canva and other third-party stock image providers, with attribution included where required.